Community suitability of M'Sila, Algeria
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 64
72
best land · p90
70%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 43
Governance, safety & tenure 43
Economy & cost 90
Society, freedom & health 86
Land & water 67
Climate, growing & hazards 57
Autonomy & access 89
Where it pushes back
Food & forage diversityGovernance & corruptionLegal entity & land framework
Within M'Sila — 47 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Djebel Messaad
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (43)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 67
Ouenougha
strongest Autonomy & access (96) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (43)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 67
Beni Ilmene
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (43)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
Hammam Dhalaa
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (43)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
Maadid
strongest Autonomy & access (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (43)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
Maarif
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
Ouled Sidi Brahim
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
Ain Khadra
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Benzouh
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
El Hamel
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Khoubana
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Magra
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Medjedel
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Ouled Addi Guebala
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Oultene
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Tamsa
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Tarmount
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Belaiba
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Berhoum
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Bir Fodda
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Bouti Sayeh
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Dehahna
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
El Houamed
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Khettouti Sed El Djir
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Menaa
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Mohamed Boudiaf
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Sidi Aissa
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Sidi Ameur
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Sidi Hadjeres
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Sidi M'Hamed
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Slim
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Ain El Hadjel
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Ain Fares
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Ben Srour
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
M'Cif
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Ouled Mansour
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Chellal
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Ouled Madhi
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Ouled Slimane
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Zerzour
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Soumaa
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 61
Ain Errich
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Bousaada
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Ouled Derradj
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Ain El Melh
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
M'Tarfa
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
M'Sila
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 53
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Algeria
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.