Community suitability of Northern Territory, Australia
Currently not suitable confidence B · live score 36
78
best land · p90
77%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 82
Governance, safety & tenure 82
Society, freedom & health 95
Land & water 80
Climate, growing & hazards 58
Autonomy & access 1
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityFood & forage diversityGrowing conditions
Within Northern Territory — 17 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Litchfield (M)
strongest Society, freedom & health (95) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (61)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 79
Coomalie (S)
strongest Society, freedom & health (95) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (61)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 78
Belyuen (S)
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (59)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 77
Wagait (S)
strongest Society, freedom & health (95) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (65)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Unincorporated NT
strongest Society, freedom & health (95) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (35)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Palmerston (C)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Katherine (T)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Tiwi Islands (S)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
West Arnhem (S)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Darwin (C)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
East Arnhem (S)
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Roper Gulf (S)
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Victoria-Daly (S)
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36
Barkly (S)
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
Central Desert (S)
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
MacDonnell (S)
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
Alice Springs (T)
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Australia
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.