Community suitability of Sergipe, Brazil
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 73
87
best land · p90
98%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 50
Governance, safety & tenure 48
Economy & cost 88
Society, freedom & health 99
Land & water 85
Climate, growing & hazards 79
Autonomy & access 96
Where it pushes back
Governance & corruptionLegal entity & land frameworkGrowing conditions
Within Sergipe — 76 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Araua
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 76
Amparo De Sao Francisco
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 75
Boquim
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 75
Canhoba
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 75
Carira
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 75
Indiaroba
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 75
Itabaianinha
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 75
Nossa Senhora Aparecida
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 75
Pedrinhas
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 75
Santa Luzia Do Itanhy
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 75
Cristinapolis
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Estancia
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Frei Paulo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Nossa Senhora Da Gloria
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Nossa Senhora De Lourdes
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Porto Da Folha
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Riachao Do Dantas
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Salgado
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Telha
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Umbauba
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Aquidaba
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Caninde De Sao Francisco
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Capela
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Cedro De Sao Joao
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Cumbe
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Feira Nova
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Gararu
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Gracho Cardoso
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Itabi
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Itaporanga D'ajuda
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Lagarto
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Macambira
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Pinhao
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Pirambu
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Sao Miguel Do Aleixo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Tobias Barreto
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Tomar Do Geru
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Campo Do Brito
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Japaratuba
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Japoata
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Malhada Dos Bois
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Monte Alegre De Sergipe
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Muribeca
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Neopolis
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Nossa Senhora Das Dores
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Pedra Mole
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Poco Redondo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Poco Verde
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Ribeiropolis
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Sao Francisco
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Pacatuba
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Propria
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Santana Do Sao Francisco
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Sao Domingos
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Simao Dias
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Siriri
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Brejo Grande
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Ilha Das Flores
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
General Maynard
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Rosario Do Catete
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Santa Rosa De Lima
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Canavieiras
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 68
Divina Pastora
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Malhador
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Areia Branca
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Carmopolis
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Riachuelo
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Santo Amaro Das Brotas
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Maruim
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Moita Bonita
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Sao Cristovao
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Itabaiana
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Laranjeiras
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Barra Dos Coqueiros
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Nossa Senhora Do Socorro
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Aracaju
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Brazil
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.