Community suitability of Guera, Chad
Currently not suitable confidence B · live score 30
64
best land · p90
34%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 38
Governance, safety & tenure 30
Economy & cost 66
Society, freedom & health 9
Land & water 90
Climate, growing & hazards 37
Autonomy & access 20
Where it pushes back
Healthcare qualityFood & forage diversityAccessibility
Within Guera — 21 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Bitkine
strongest Land & water (86) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 35
Dadjo-i
strongest Land & water (87) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 35
Sara-arabe
strongest Land & water (89) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 35
Bidio
strongest Land & water (90) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 34
Djonkor-aboutelfane
strongest Land & water (88) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 34
Djonkor-guera
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 34
Yalnass
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 34
Dadjo-ii
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 33
Moubi-zarga
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 33
Gogmi
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 31
Dangaleat
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 30
Melfi
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 30
Mokofi
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 29
Daguela
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 28
Kenga
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 28
Sorki
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 28
Koffa
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 25
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Chad
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.