Community suitability of Henan Sheng, China
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 73
90
best land · p90
97%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Society, freedom & health 86
Land & water 85
Climate, growing & hazards 85
Autonomy & access 96
Where it pushes back
Food & forage diversitySoil qualityHealthcare quality
Within Henan Sheng — 17 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Xinyang
strongest Autonomy & access (94) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (86)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 75
Zhumadian
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (86)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 74
Pingdingshan
strongest Autonomy & access (97) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (85)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Nanyang
strongest Land & water (88) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (82)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Moderately suitable 71
Luoyang
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Sanmenxia
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Xuchang
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 69
Shangqiu
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 69
Kaifeng
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Xinxiang
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Jiaozuo
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Luohe
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Anyang
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 67
Zhengzhou
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Hebi
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Puyang
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in China
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.