Community suitability of Chagang-do, Dem People S Rep Of Korea
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 52
87
best land · p90
98%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 25
Governance, safety & tenure 33
Society, freedom & health 80
Land & water 83
Climate, growing & hazards 84
Autonomy & access 61
Where it pushes back
Legal entity & land frameworkLand tenure securityGovernance & corruption
Within Chagang-do — 18 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Jonchon
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (85) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (25)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 55
Junggang
strongest Autonomy & access (86) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (25)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 55
Sijung
strongest Autonomy & access (97) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (25)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 55
Tongsin
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (88) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (25)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 55
Huichon
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (89) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (25)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 54
Janggang
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 54
Songgan
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 53
Songwon
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 53
Wiwon
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 53
Manpo
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 52
Ryongrim
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 52
Hwaphyong
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 50
Jasong
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 50
Kanggye
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 50
Chosan
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 49
Kopung
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 49
Usi
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Marginally suitable 48
Rangrim
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 45
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Dem People S Rep Of Korea
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.