Community suitability of Nordjylland, Denmark
Highly suitable confidence B · live score 85
91
best land · p90
90%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 85
Governance, safety & tenure 89
Economy & cost 97
Society, freedom & health 93
Land & water 85
Climate, growing & hazards 88
Autonomy & access 92
Where it pushes back
Soil qualityCoastal riskWater availability & quality
Within Nordjylland — 27 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Highly suitable 88
Highly suitable 88
Highly suitable 88
Loekken-vraa
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (85)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 88
Highly suitable 88
Skoerping
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 87
Hadsund
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 86
Hjoerring
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 86
Noerager
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 86
Farsoe
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 85
Hobro
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 85
Pandrup
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 85
Saeby
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Broenderslev
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 84
Brovst
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 84
Skagen
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Dronninglund
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 83
Fjerritslev
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 83
Frederikshavn
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Loegstoer
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 83
Nibe
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 83
Sejlflod
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 83
Stoevring
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 83
Hals
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 82
Aabybro
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 81
Laesoe
pushes back: Coastal risk
Moderately suitable 79
Aalborg
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Denmark
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.