Community suitability of Saare maakond, Estonia
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 69
87
best land · p90
94%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 77
Governance, safety & tenure 81
Economy & cost 92
Society, freedom & health 88
Land & water 81
Climate, growing & hazards 87
Autonomy & access 23
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityLand cover & degradationWater availability & quality
Within Saare maakond — 16 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Moderately suitable 72
Orissaare vald
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (30)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Laimjala vald
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (28)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Pöide vald
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (34)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Kaarma vald
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (22)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Leisi vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Pihtla vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Valjala vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Kärla vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Salme vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Torgu vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Kihelkonna vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Lümanda vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Mustjala vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Ruhnu vald
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Kuressaare linn
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Estonia
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.