Community suitability of Jutiapa, Guatemala
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 72
88
best land · p90
99%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 50
Governance, safety & tenure 40
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 78
Land & water 83
Climate, growing & hazards 81
Autonomy & access 94
Where it pushes back
Land tenure securityGovernance & corruptionLegal entity & land framework
Within Jutiapa — 17 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Santa Catarina Mita
strongest Autonomy & access (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Quesada
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Agua Blanca
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Atescatempa
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Jutiapa
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Jalpatagua
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Asunción Mita
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
El Adelanto
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Zapotitlán
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
El Progreso
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Yupiltepeque
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Comapa
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Jerez
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
San José Acatempa
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Conguaco
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Moyuta
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Pasaco
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Guatemala
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.