Community suitability of Aktyubinskaya, Kazakhstan
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 45
70
best land · p90
64%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 56
Governance, safety & tenure 51
Economy & cost 67
Society, freedom & health 82
Land & water 75
Climate, growing & hazards 54
Autonomy & access 7
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityFood & forage diversityLand tenure security
Within Aktyubinskaya — 13 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Aqtobe City area
strongest Autonomy & access (90) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 67
Kargaly
strongest Society, freedom & health (82) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Martuk
strongest Society, freedom & health (82) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Alga
strongest Society, freedom & health (82) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Khromtau
strongest Society, freedom & health (82) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (40)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 59
Khobda
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 55
Mugaljar
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 53
Temir
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 52
Uil
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 49
Aitekebi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 46
Shalkar
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36
Irgyz
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 34
Bayganin
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 33
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Kazakhstan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.