Community suitability of Nimba, Liberia
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 54
74
best land · p90
95%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 42
Governance, safety & tenure 40
Economy & cost 69
Society, freedom & health 41
Land & water 63
Climate, growing & hazards 75
Autonomy & access 64
Where it pushes back
Healthcare qualityWater availability & qualityGovernance & corruption
Within Nimba — 17 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Meinpea-Mahn
strongest Autonomy & access (93) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 58
Garr-Bain
strongest Autonomy & access (90) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 57
Wee-Gbehyi-Mahn
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 57
Zoe-Gbao
strongest Autonomy & access (96) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 57
Gbor
strongest Autonomy & access (88) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (40)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 56
Leewehpea-Mahn
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 56
Boe and Quilla
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 55
Buu-Yao
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 55
Doe
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 55
Twan River
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 55
Yarmein
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 55
Gbehlay-Geh
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 54
Kparblee
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 54
Sanniquellie Mahn
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 54
Yarwein Mehnsonnoh
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 54
Yarpea Mahn
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Marginally suitable 53
Gbi & Doru
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 46
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Liberia
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.