Community suitability of Moere Og Romsdal, Norway
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 65
78
best land · p90
72%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Governance, safety & tenure 84
Society, freedom & health 95
Land & water 69
Climate, growing & hazards 71
Autonomy & access 46
Where it pushes back
Food & forage diversityAccessibilitySoil quality
Within Moere Og Romsdal — 38 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Moderately suitable 75
Tingvoll
strongest Society, freedom & health (95) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (70)
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 75
Averoey
strongest Society, freedom & health (95) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (63)
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 74
Halsa
strongest Society, freedom & health (95) ·
weakest Land & water (73)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 74
Frei
strongest Society, freedom & health (95) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (69)
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 73
Tustna
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 73
Eide
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Gjemnes
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Kristiansund
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 72
Molde
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 71
Rindal
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 71
Fraena
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Smoela
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Surnadal
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Aukra
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Midsund
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Skodje
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Oerskog
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Vestnes
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Haram
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Sunndal
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Hareid
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Sandoey
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Aalesund
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 61
Giske
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Marginally suitable 61
Nesset
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 61
Ulstein
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Rauma
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Volda
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 60
Heroey
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Sula
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Sykkylven
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Vanylven
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 58
Sande
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Oersta
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Stordal
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Stranda
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Norddal
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 53
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Norway
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.