Community suitability of Central, Paraguay

Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 73
83
best land · p90
93%
good land
one block
Explore Central on the map →

How each domain holds up

Legal & sovereignty 53
Governance, safety & tenure 46
Economy & cost 91
Society, freedom & health 80
Land & water 79
Climate, growing & hazards 78
Autonomy & access 96

Where it pushes back

Governance & corruptionLand tenure securityLegal entity & land framework

Within Central — 20 sub-regions

Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.

Villeta
strongest Economy & cost (91) · weakest Governance, safety & tenure (46)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Nueva Italia
strongest Economy & cost (91) · weakest Governance, safety & tenure (46)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Ita
strongest Economy & cost (91) · weakest Autonomy & access (42)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Aregua
strongest Economy & cost (91) · weakest Autonomy & access (39)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
San Antonio
strongest Economy & cost (91) · weakest Autonomy & access (39)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Ypacarai
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Ypane
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Limpio
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Itaugua
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Guarambare
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Luque
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
M. Roque Alonso
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Asuncion
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
Lambare
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
Villa Elisa
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
J. A. Saldivar
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 50
Capiata
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 39
Nemby
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
San Lorenzo
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Fdo. De La Mora
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36

Reading the land, criterion by criterion

Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.

Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening

These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.

Other regions in Paraguay

Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.