Community suitability of Skaane Laen, Sweden
Highly suitable confidence B · live score 85
92
best land · p90
96%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 81
Governance, safety & tenure 85
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 83
Climate, growing & hazards 90
Autonomy & access 88
Where it pushes back
Soil qualityLand cover & degradationWater availability & quality
Within Skaane Laen — 33 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Highly suitable 88
Simrishamn
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (81)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 88
Tomelilla
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (81)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 88
Highly suitable 87
Highly suitable 87
Perstorp
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 87
Ystad
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 87
Osby
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 86
Sjoebo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 86
Bromoella
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 85
Hoeoer
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 85
Hoerby
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 85
Kristianstad
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 85
Oerkelljunga
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 85
Skurup
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 85
Baastad
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Svaloev
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 84
Aengelholm
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 82
Aastorp
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Esloev
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Trelleborg
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Bjuv
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Hoeganaes
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Svedala
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Lund
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Landskrona
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Kaevlinge
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Helsingborg
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Vellinge
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Staffanstorp
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Lomma
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Malmoe
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Burloev
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 41
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Sweden
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.