Community suitability of Udon Thani, Thailand
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 73
82
best land · p90
98%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 57
Governance, safety & tenure 51
Economy & cost 97
Society, freedom & health 86
Land & water 83
Climate, growing & hazards 71
Autonomy & access 89
Where it pushes back
Growing conditionsGovernance & corruptionLand tenure security
Within Udon Thani — 18 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Non Saeng
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 76
Nong Wua So
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 76
Kumphawapi
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Kut Chap
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Nam Som
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Non Sa-at
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Nong Han
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Si That
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Ban Phu
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Chaiwan
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Na Yong
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Phibunrak
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Phen
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Sang Khom
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Thung Fon
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Wang Sam Mo
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Ban Dung
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Muang Udon Thani
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Thailand
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.