Community suitability of Nebraska, United States Of America
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 72
91
best land · p90
99%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Governance, safety & tenure 78
Economy & cost 95
Society, freedom & health 88
Land & water 87
Climate, growing & hazards 81
Autonomy & access 46
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityFood & forage diversityWater availability & quality
Within Nebraska — 93 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Dodge
strongest Autonomy & access (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (78)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 84
Fillmore
strongest Economy & cost (95) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (78)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 83
Gage
strongest Autonomy & access (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (78)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 83
Johnson
strongest Autonomy & access (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (78)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 83
Saline
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (78)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 83
Butler
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 82
Colfax
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 82
Hamilton
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 82
Pawnee
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 82
Polk
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 82
Seward
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 82
York
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 82
Burt
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 81
Merrick
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 81
Nemaha
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 81
Otoe
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Highly suitable 81
Saunders
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 81
Washington
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 81
Wayne
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 81
Clay
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 80
Dixon
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 80
Hall
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 80
Jefferson
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 80
Richardson
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 80
Stanton
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 80
Cass
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 79
Cedar
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 79
Cuming
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 79
Howard
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Madison
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 79
Nance
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 79
Pierce
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 79
Thurston
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 79
Platte
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 78
Thayer
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 78
Adams
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 77
Buffalo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Knox
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 77
Nuckolls
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 77
Antelope
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 76
Dakota
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 76
Kearney
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 76
Sherman
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Boone
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 75
Greeley
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Lancaster
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Webster
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Boyd
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 73
Phelps
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Dawson
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Franklin
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Holt
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Scotts Bluff
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Valley
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Harlan
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Wheeler
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Banner
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Kimball
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Cheyenne
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 69
Garfield
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Gosper
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Chase
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Custer
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Deuel
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Morrill
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Perkins
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Furnas
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Rock
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Sarpy
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Dundy
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Keya Paha
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Loup
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Box Butte
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Dawes
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Hitchcock
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Keith
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Blaine
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Brown
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Douglas
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Frontier
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Hayes
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Lincoln
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Logan
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Sheridan
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Sioux
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Arthur
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Garden
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Grant
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
McPherson
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Red Willow
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Cherry
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Thomas
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 61
Hooker
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in United States Of America
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.