Community suitability of New Mexico, United States Of America
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 72
79
best land · p90
92%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Governance, safety & tenure 78
Economy & cost 95
Society, freedom & health 88
Land & water 74
Climate, growing & hazards 71
Autonomy & access 56
Where it pushes back
Food & forage diversityAccessibilityWater availability & quality
Within New Mexico — 33 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Santa Fe
strongest Economy & cost (95) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (75)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 79
Los Alamos
strongest Economy & cost (95) ·
weakest Land & water (77)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 77
Sandoval
strongest Economy & cost (95) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (70)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 77
Valencia
strongest Economy & cost (95) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (65)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 76
Doña Ana
strongest Economy & cost (95) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (62)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 75
Torrance
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 75
Bernalillo
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 73
Cibola
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 73
Curry
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 73
Rio Arriba
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 73
Taos
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 73
Colfax
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Grant
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Lea
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Roosevelt
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Socorro
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Guadalupe
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 71
Lincoln
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 71
Luna
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 71
Mora
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Otero
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 71
San Miguel
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 71
McKinley
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Quay
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Sierra
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Hidalgo
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 69
Union
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 69
Catron
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Eddy
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Harding
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Chaves
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 67
De Baca
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
San Juan
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in United States Of America
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.