Community suitability of Nghe An, Viet Nam
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 63
84
best land · p90
98%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 51
Governance, safety & tenure 52
Economy & cost 92
Society, freedom & health 82
Land & water 79
Climate, growing & hazards 81
Autonomy & access 53
Where it pushes back
Legal entity & land frameworkGovernance & corruptionLand tenure security
Within Nghe An — 19 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Anh Son
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (51)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Moderately suitable 68
Tan Ky
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (51)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Moderately suitable 68
Nghia Dan
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (51)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Moderately suitable 67
Quy Hop
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (51)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Moderately suitable 66
Thanh Chuong
strongest Economy & cost (92) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (51)
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Moderately suitable 66
Ky Son
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Yen Thanh
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Moderately suitable 64
Quynh Luu
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Moderately suitable 62
Do Luong
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 61
Nam Dan
pushes back: Growing conditions
Marginally suitable 61
Nghi Loc
pushes back: Growing conditions
Marginally suitable 61
Quy Chau
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Con Cuong
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Tuong Duong
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Dien Chau
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Hung Nguyen
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Que Phong
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Cua Lo Township
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Vinh City
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 32
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Viet Nam
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.