Community suitability of Acre, Brazil
Currently not suitable confidence B · live score 38
75
best land · p90
99%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 50
Governance, safety & tenure 48
Economy & cost 88
Society, freedom & health 99
Land & water 62
Climate, growing & hazards 77
Autonomy & access 1
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityWater availability & qualityGrowing conditions
Within Acre — 22 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Epitaciolandia
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Placido De Castro
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Senador Guiomard
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Acrelandia
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Capixaba
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Porto Acre
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Brasileia
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Bujari
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Rodrigues Alves
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Xapuri
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Rio Branco
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 51
Assis Brasil
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 45
Jordao
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Sena Madureira
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Cruzeiro Do Sul
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Feijo
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Manoel Urbano
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Marechal Thaumaturgo
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Porto Walter
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Santa Rosa Do Purus
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Tarauaca
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Mancio Lima
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Brazil
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.