Community suitability of Amapa, Brazil
Currently not suitable confidence B · live score 35
67
best land · p90
49%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 50
Governance, safety & tenure 48
Economy & cost 88
Society, freedom & health 99
Land & water 44
Climate, growing & hazards 76
Autonomy & access 1
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityWater availability & qualityGrowing conditions
Within Amapa — 16 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Santana
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
Itaubal
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (21)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Macapa
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (22)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 55
Porto Grande
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (7)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 47
Tartarugalzinho
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (4)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 43
Mazagao
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36
Vitoria Do Jari
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36
Ferreira Gomes
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
Pedra Branca Do Amapari
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
Laranjal Do Jari
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
Cutias
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 34
Serra Do Navio
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 34
Oiapoque
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 33
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Brazil
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.