Community suitability of Mato Grosso, Brazil
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 55
79
best land · p90
98%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 50
Governance, safety & tenure 48
Economy & cost 88
Society, freedom & health 99
Land & water 69
Climate, growing & hazards 76
Autonomy & access 15
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityGovernance & corruptionGrowing conditions
Within Mato Grosso — 126 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Acorizal
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Cuiaba
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Mirassol D'oeste
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Sao Jose Do Povo
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Sinop
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Jangada
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Rondonopolis
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 71
Sao Jose Dos Quatro Marcos
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Sorriso
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 70
Gloria D'oeste
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Lucas Do Rio Verde
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Nova Olimpia
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Pedra Preta
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Pontal Do Araguaia
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Rio Branco
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Vera
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Alto Taquari
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Barra Do Garcas
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Denise
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Dom Aquino
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Jaciara
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Juscimeira
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Lambari D'oeste
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Nossa Senhora Do Livramento
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Ponte Branca
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Reserva Do Cabacal
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Ribeiraozinho
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Sao Pedro Da Cipa
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Alto Paraguai
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Arenapolis
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Chapada Dos Guimaraes
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
General Carneiro
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Guiratinga
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Santo Afonso
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 67
Torixoreu
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Araputanga
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Campo Verde
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Claudia
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 66
Colider
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 66
Figueiropolis D'oeste
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Poxoreo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Salto Do Ceu
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Varzea Grande
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Alto Araguaia
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 65
Alto Garcas
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 65
Araguainha
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 65
Barra Do Bugres
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Nobres
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Nova Marilandia
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Nova Mutum
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Tapurah
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Jauru
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 64
Nortelandia
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Nova Brasilandia
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Nova Xavantina
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Rosario Oeste
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Terra Nova Do Norte
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 64
Tesouro
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Campo Novo Do Parecis
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Diamantino
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Indiavai
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 63
Nova Guarita
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
Porto Estrela
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Itiquira
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Novo Horizonte Do Norte
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Primavera Do Leste
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Santo Antonio Do Leverger
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Nova Ubirata
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Itauba
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Santa Carmem
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Sao Jose Do Rio Claro
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Tangara Da Serra
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Araguaiana
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Carlinda
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 59
Nova Lacerda
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Planalto Da Serra
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Pontes E Lacerda
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Porto Esperidiao
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Vila Bela Da Santissima Trindade
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Agua Boa
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Castanheira
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Porto Dos Gauchos
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Tabapora
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Brasnorte
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Caceres
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Campinapolis
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Nova Canaa Do Norte
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Novo Sao Joaquim
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Paranatinga
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Campos De Julio
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Canarana
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Confresa
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Nova Maringa
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Uniao Do Sul
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Alta Floresta
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Alto Boa Vista
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Barao De Melgaco
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Guaranta Do Norte
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 55
Paranaita
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Sapezal
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Vila Rica
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Cana Brava Do Norte
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Pocone
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Ribeirao Cascalheira
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Santa Terezinha
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Cocalinho
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Marcelandia
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Porto Alegre Do Norte
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Novo Mundo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
Juara
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 50
Nova Monte Verde
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 50
Matupa
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 49
Comodoro
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 48
Sao Jose Do Xingu
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 48
Juruena
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 47
Sao Felix Do Araguaia
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 47
Feliz Natal
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 39
Gaucha Do Norte
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 39
Aripuana
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Cotriguacu
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Juina
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Luciara
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Querencia
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Apiacas
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36
Nova Bandeirantes
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36
Peixoto De Azevedo
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 36
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Brazil
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.