Community suitability of Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 59
81
best land · p90
93%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 50
Governance, safety & tenure 48
Economy & cost 88
Society, freedom & health 99
Land & water 81
Climate, growing & hazards 67
Autonomy & access 25
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityFood & forage diversityGovernance & corruption
Within Mato Grosso Do Sul — 77 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Caarapo
strongest Autonomy & access (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Dourados
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Itapora
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Laguna Carapa
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Aral Moreira
strongest Society, freedom & health (99) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (48)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Douradina
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 72
Mundo Novo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Amambai
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Eldorado
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Gloria De Dourados
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Ponta Pora
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Rochedo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Sidrolandia
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Terenos
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 71
Antonio Joao
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 70
Deodapolis
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Dois Irmaos Do Buriti
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 70
Fatima Do Sul
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 70
Itaquirai
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 70
Japora
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 70
Jaraguari
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 70
Campo Grande
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Coronel Sapucaia
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Juti
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Navirai
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Tacuru
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Vicentina
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Anastacio
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Bandeirantes
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Bataguassu
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Ivinhema
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Maracaju
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Tres Lagoas
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Bataipora
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Corguinho
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 67
Guia Lopes Da Laguna
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Iguatemi
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Jatei
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Nova Alvorada Do Sul
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Novo Horizonte Do Sul
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Rio Brilhante
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 67
Rio Negro
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 67
Selviria
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Aparecida Do Taboado
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Nioaque
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Nova Andradina
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Paranhos
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Sete Quedas
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Anaurilandia
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 65
Angelica
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 65
Bela Vista
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Bodoquena
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Brasilandia
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 65
Costa Rica
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Jardim
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Ladario
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Paranaiba
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 65
Santa Rita Do Pardo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Sao Gabriel Do Oeste
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Taquarussu
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Camapua
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Miranda
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Ribas Do Rio Pardo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 64
Bonito
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Cassilandia
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Agua Clara
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Alcinopolis
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Chapadao Do Sul
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Inocencia
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Caracol
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Sonora
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Coxim
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Aquidauana
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 57
Pedro Gomes
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Rio Verde De Mato Grosso
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Porto Murtinho
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Corumba
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 45
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Brazil
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.