Community suitability of Salamat, Chad
Not suitable confidence B · live score 20
71
best land · p90
86%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 38
Governance, safety & tenure 30
Economy & cost 66
Society, freedom & health 9
Land & water 92
Climate, growing & hazards 46
Autonomy & access 1
Where it pushes back
Healthcare qualityAccessibilityFood & forage diversity
Within Salamat — 16 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Yalnas-abou-deia
strongest Land & water (91) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 32
Am-timan
strongest Land & water (94) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 31
Autochtone
strongest Land & water (90) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 30
Rachid
strongest Land & water (92) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 30
Torom
strongest Land & water (92) ·
weakest Society, freedom & health (9)
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 30
Kibet-angreb
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 29
Kibet-soum-soum
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 29
Dagal
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 27
Salamat-am-timan
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 26
Barh-azoum-am-timan
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 24
Hemat-am-timan
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Currently not suitable 22
Dar-salim
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Not suitable 20
Doudeye
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Not suitable 20
Hemat-haraze
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Not suitable 20
Kouga-tchad
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Not suitable 20
Mangueigne
pushes back: Healthcare quality
Not suitable 20
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Chad
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.