Community suitability of Xinjiang Uygur Zizhiqu, China
Currently not suitable confidence B · live score 22
70
best land · p90
73%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Society, freedom & health 86
Land & water 60
Climate, growing & hazards 63
Autonomy & access 1
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityFood & forage diversityLand cover & degradation
Within Xinjiang Uygur Zizhiqu — 15 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Karamay
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (50)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Shihezi
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (63)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 61
Ürümqi
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (41)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 53
Ili Kazakh
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (19)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 51
Tacheng
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (22)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 49
Changji Hui
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 49
Börtala Mongol
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 47
Altay
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Kizilsu Kirghiz
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
Hami
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 35
Aksu
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 32
Turfan
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 22
Kashgar
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 22
Khotan
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 22
Bayin'gholin Mongol
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 21
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in China
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.