Community suitability of Huila, Colombia
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 62
85
best land · p90
99%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 55
Governance, safety & tenure 47
Economy & cost 77
Society, freedom & health 86
Land & water 72
Climate, growing & hazards 90
Autonomy & access 29
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityGovernance & corruptionLand tenure security
Within Huila — 37 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Elias
strongest Autonomy & access (95) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Timana
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 74
Agrado
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Hobo
strongest Autonomy & access (93) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 73
Altamira
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Campo Alegre
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Palermo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Pitalito
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Villa Vieja
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Yaguara
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Garzon
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Paicol
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Suaza
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Tello
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Tesalia
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Oporapa
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 70
Guadalupe
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Isnos
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Tarqui
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 69
Aipe
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Gigante
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Pital
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Rivera
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Baraya
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 67
Neiva
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Salado Blanco
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
La Plata
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Acevedo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Algeciras
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
La Argentina
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
San Agustin
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Colombia
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Nataga
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Palestina
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Teruel
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Iquira
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 43
Santa Maria
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Colombia
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.