Community suitability of Tolima, Colombia
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 61
83
best land · p90
90%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 55
Governance, safety & tenure 47
Economy & cost 77
Society, freedom & health 86
Land & water 68
Climate, growing & hazards 86
Autonomy & access 31
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityGovernance & corruptionLand tenure security
Within Tolima — 46 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Venadillo
strongest Autonomy & access (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Alvarado
strongest Autonomy & access (92) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Ambalema
strongest Autonomy & access (92) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Armero (guayabal)
strongest Autonomy & access (90) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Coello
strongest Autonomy & access (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Icononzo
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Piedras
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Valle De San Juan
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 72
Carmen De Apicala
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Honda
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Ibague
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
Lerida
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 71
San Luis
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Cajamarca
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 70
Coyaima
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Herveo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 70
Libano
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Murillo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Prado
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Purificacion
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Salda¥a
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Suarez
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Anzoategui
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 68
Casabianca
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Cunday
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Guamo
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Mariquita
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Melgar
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Natagaima
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Villa Hermosa
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Falan
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 67
Ortega
pushes back: Governance & corruption
Moderately suitable 66
Santa Isabel
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 66
Alpujarra
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Dolores
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Rovira
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Villarrica
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Roncesvalles
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Flandes
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Ataco
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 60
Espinal
pushes back: Growing conditions
Marginally suitable 60
San Antonio
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Chaparral
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Planadas
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Rioblanco
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Colombia
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.