Community suitability of Guanajuato, Mexico
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 72
91
best land · p90
99%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 52
Governance, safety & tenure 39
Economy & cost 86
Society, freedom & health 100
Land & water 85
Climate, growing & hazards 88
Autonomy & access 97
Where it pushes back
Land tenure securityGovernance & corruptionLegal entity & land framework
Within Guanajuato — 46 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Jerecuaro
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 75
Manuel Doblado
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 75
Coroneo
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Cueramaro
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Moroleon
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Penjamo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Tarimoro
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Comonfort
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
Huanimaro
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
Ocampo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
San Jose Iturbide
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
Yuriria
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
Abasolo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Allende
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Guanajuato
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Romita
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
San Diego De La Union
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
San Felipe
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Santa Catarina
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Santiago Maravatio
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Tierra Blanca
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Doctor Mora
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Dolores Hidalgo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Jaral Del Progreso
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Salvatierra
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
San Luis De La Paz
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Tarandacuao
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Victoria
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Acambaro
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Apaseo El Alto
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Purisima Del Rincon
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
San Francisco Del Rincon
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Sta. Cruz De Juventino R.
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Valle De Santiago
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Cortazar
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Xichu
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Atarjea
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 67
Apaseo El Grande
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Pueblo Nuevo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Salamanca
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Celaya
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 63
Silao
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 63
Irapuato
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 62
Leon
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 62
Uriangato
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Villagran
pushes back: Land tenure security
Marginally suitable 61
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Mexico
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.