Community suitability of Tlaxcala, Mexico
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 72
95
best land · p90
100%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 52
Governance, safety & tenure 39
Economy & cost 86
Society, freedom & health 100
Land & water 88
Climate, growing & hazards 96
Autonomy & access 78
Where it pushes back
Land tenure securityGovernance & corruptionLegal entity & land framework
Within Tlaxcala — 44 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Terrenate
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 76
Tlaxco
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 76
Atlzayanga
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Calpulalpan
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
San Pablo Del Monte
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Teolocholco
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 74
Acuamanala De Miguel H.
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
Atlangatepec
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
Mazatecochco De Jose M.
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
Sanctorum De Lazaro C.
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 73
Cuapiaxtla
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Nanacamilpa De Mariano A.
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Tetla
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
El Carmen Tequexquitla
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Espanita
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Hueyotlipan
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Munoz De Domingo Arenas
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Xaloztoc
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Tocatlan
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Chiautempan
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Papalotla De Xicohtencatl
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 67
Zitlaltepec De Trinidad S
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 67
Huamantla
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Tenancingo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Apizaco
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 65
Cuaxomulco
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Tzompantepec
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 65
Xicotzingo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 65
Contla De Juan Cuamatzi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Ixtenco
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Ixtacuixtla De Mariano M.
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Xalcotan
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Santa Cruz Tlaxcala
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 61
Zacatelco
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Tepeyanco
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Amaxac De Guerrero
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Panotla
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Tepetitla De Lardizabal
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Yauhquemehcan
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Apetatitlan De Antonio C.
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 49
Tetlatlahuca
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 48
Totolac
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 48
Nativitas
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Tlaxcala
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Mexico
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.