Community suitability of Vaesterbottens Laen, Sweden

Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 74
77
best land · p90
92%
good land
one block

How each domain holds up

Legal & sovereignty 81
Governance, safety & tenure 85
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 73
Climate, growing & hazards 72
Autonomy & access 47

Where it pushes back

AccessibilityGrowing conditionsFood & forage diversity

Within Vaesterbottens Laen — 15 sub-regions

Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.

Nordmaling
strongest Autonomy & access (99) · weakest Land & water (71)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Robertsfors
strongest Autonomy & access (98) · weakest Land & water (71)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Bjurholm
strongest Economy & cost (96) · weakest Land & water (72)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Vindeln
strongest Economy & cost (96) · weakest Land & water (72)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Skellefteaa
strongest Economy & cost (96) · weakest Autonomy & access (71)
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 80
Vaennaes
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 80
Umeaa
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 79
Lycksele
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 78
Norsjoe
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 77
Aasele
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 76
Malaa
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 74
Dorotea
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Vilhelmina
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Sorsele
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Storuman
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65

Reading the land, criterion by criterion

Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.

Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening

These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.

Other regions in Sweden

Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.