Community suitability of Si Saket, Thailand
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 70
80
best land · p90
99%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 57
Governance, safety & tenure 51
Economy & cost 97
Society, freedom & health 86
Land & water 83
Climate, growing & hazards 69
Autonomy & access 64
Where it pushes back
Growing conditionsGovernance & corruptionLand tenure security
Within Si Saket — 18 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Kanthararom
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 73
Muang Si Sa Ket
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 72
Nam Kliang
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Non Khun
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Wang Hin
strongest Economy & cost (97) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (51)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Yang Chum Noi
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 71
Huai Thap Than
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Khukhan
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Phrai Bung
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Phu Sing
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Prang Ku
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Si Rattana
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Uthumphon Phisai
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 70
Bung Bun
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Muang Chan
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Rasi Salai
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 69
Kantharalak
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Khun Han
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Thailand
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.