Community suitability of Andijan, Uzbekistan
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 56
82
best land · p90
87%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 47
Governance, safety & tenure 47
Economy & cost 62
Society, freedom & health 77
Land & water 74
Climate, growing & hazards 71
Autonomy & access 58
Where it pushes back
Food & forage diversityLand tenure securityLegal entity & land framework
Within Andijan — 17 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Khanabad city
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (85) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Marginally suitable 61
Markhamat district
strongest Autonomy & access (87) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Djalalkuduk district
strongest Society, freedom & health (77) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Kurgantepa district
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (80) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Paxtaabad district
strongest Society, freedom & health (77) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Ulugnar district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Boz district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 56
Khadjaabad district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 55
Izboskan district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 54
Altinkul district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 53
Balikchi district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 53
Bulakbashi district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 53
Andijan district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 52
Shakhrixan district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 52
Asaka district
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 51
Andijan city
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 30
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Uzbekistan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.