Community suitability of Navoiy, Uzbekistan
Currently not suitable confidence B · live score 40
64
best land · p90
17%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 47
Governance, safety & tenure 47
Economy & cost 62
Society, freedom & health 77
Land & water 61
Climate, growing & hazards 45
Autonomy & access 9
Where it pushes back
Food & forage diversityAccessibilityLand cover & degradation
Within Navoiy — 10 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Khatirchi district
strongest Autonomy & access (87) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 59
Karmana district
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (44)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Kiziltepa district
strongest Society, freedom & health (77) ·
weakest Climate, growing & hazards (44)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 55
Nurata district
strongest Society, freedom & health (77) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 54
Navbakhor district
strongest Society, freedom & health (77) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (39)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 50
Kanimekh district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 49
Uchkuduk district
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Currently not suitable 36
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Uzbekistan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.