Community suitability of Casanare, Colombia
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 55
75
best land · p90
77%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 55
Governance, safety & tenure 47
Economy & cost 77
Society, freedom & health 86
Land & water 60
Climate, growing & hazards 75
Autonomy & access 21
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityWater availability & qualityGrowing conditions
Within Casanare — 19 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Yopal
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 66
Aguazul
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Land & water (42)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Nunchia
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Land & water (43)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Pore
strongest Society, freedom & health (86) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (47)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
La Salina
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (93) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (24)
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Recetor
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 58
San Luis De Palenque
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Tauramena
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 57
Mani
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Orocue
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Tamara
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 56
Chameza
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 54
Trinidad
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Hato Corozal
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Sacama
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Paz De Ariporo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 48
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Colombia
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.