Community suitability of Andhra Pradesh, India
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 67
82
best land · p90
97%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 53
Governance, safety & tenure 54
Society, freedom & health 75
Land & water 91
Climate, growing & hazards 64
Autonomy & access 98
Where it pushes back
Growing conditionsGovernance & corruptionLegal entity & land framework
Within Andhra Pradesh — 23 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Chittoor
strongest Land & water (91) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Kurnool
strongest Autonomy & access (100) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Mahbubnagar
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Prakasam
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 68
Adilabad
strongest Land & water (92) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Cuddapah
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Khammam
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Nalgonda
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Nellore
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Vishakhapatnam
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Vizianagaram
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Warangal
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Anantapur
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Karimnagar
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Medak
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
East Godavari
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Guntur
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Nizamabad
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Rangareddi
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Srikakulam
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Krishna
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
West Godavari
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Hyderabad
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 29
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in India
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.