Community suitability of Maharashtra, India

Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 65
80
best land · p90
88%
good land
one block
Explore Maharashtra on the map →

How each domain holds up

Legal & sovereignty 53
Governance, safety & tenure 54
Society, freedom & health 75
Land & water 83
Climate, growing & hazards 68
Autonomy & access 87

Where it pushes back

Growing conditionsGovernance & corruptionLegal entity & land framework

Within Maharashtra — 35 sub-regions

Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.

Yavatmal
strongest Autonomy & access (93) · weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 67
Nandurbar
strongest Autonomy & access (93) · weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Amravati
strongest Autonomy & access (95) · weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Buldana
strongest Autonomy & access (87) · weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Garhchiroli
strongest Land & water (82) · weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Nanded
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Osmanabad
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Aurangabad
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Bid
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Gondiya
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Hingoli
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Jalna
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Washim
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 66
Chandrapur
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Satara
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Parbhani
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Jalgaon
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Latur
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Nashik
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Sangli
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Solapur
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Wardha
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Ahmednagar
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Akola
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 63
Bhandara
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 63
Dhule
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 63
Kolhapur
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
Nagpur
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 62
Pune
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 62
Thane
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 55
Mumbai Suburban
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 25
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl

Reading the land, criterion by criterion

Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.

Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening

These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.

Other regions in India

Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.