Community suitability of Assam, India
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 64
80
best land · p90
53%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 53
Governance, safety & tenure 54
Society, freedom & health 75
Land & water 61
Climate, growing & hazards 76
Autonomy & access 91
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityGovernance & corruptionLegal entity & land framework
Within Assam — 23 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Golaghat
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 66
Darrang
strongest Autonomy & access (83) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Nagaon
strongest Land & water (82) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 65
Sonitpur
strongest Autonomy & access (92) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Marigaon
strongest Land & water (83) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Growing conditions
Moderately suitable 64
Barpeta
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
Kamrup
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
Karbi Anglong
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
Nalbari
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
Jorhat
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 63
North Cachar Hills
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 61
Goalpara
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 60
Tinsukia
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 59
Sibsagar
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 58
Dibrugarh
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 57
Dhuburi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 56
Hailakandi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 56
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in India
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.