Community suitability of Coahuila, Mexico
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 56
75
best land · p90
93%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 52
Governance, safety & tenure 39
Economy & cost 86
Society, freedom & health 100
Land & water 70
Climate, growing & hazards 66
Autonomy & access 22
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityFood & forage diversityLand tenure security
Within Coahuila — 38 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Arteaga
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Allende
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Frontera
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Morelos
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 68
Jimenez
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
Monclova
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
Sabinas
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 66
Saltillo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Castanos
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Sacramento
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 65
Abasolo
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
General Cepeda
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Guerrero
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Progreso
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
San Juan De Sabinas
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Villa Union
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 64
Hidalgo
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Piedras Negras
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Viesca
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Escobedo
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Nava
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Torreon
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Juarez
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 61
Nadadores
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 61
Ramos Arizpe
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 61
Candela
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Matamoros
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Lamadrid
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 59
San Pedro
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 57
Muzquiz
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Parras
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 56
Cuatrocienagas
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Francisco I. Madero
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 55
Zaragoza
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Acuna
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
San Buenaventura
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
Sierra Mojada
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 50
Ocampo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 46
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Mexico
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.