Community suitability of Tamaulipas, Mexico
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 67
86
best land · p90
97%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 52
Governance, safety & tenure 39
Economy & cost 86
Society, freedom & health 100
Land & water 82
Climate, growing & hazards 75
Autonomy & access 62
Where it pushes back
Land tenure securityGovernance & corruptionLegal entity & land framework
Within Tamaulipas — 43 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Mainero
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 72
Victoria
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 71
Antiguo Morelos
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Nuevo Morelos
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 70
Guemez
strongest Society, freedom & health (100) ·
weakest Governance, safety & tenure (39)
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Ocampo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Palmillas
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Villagran
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Xicotencatl
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 69
Aldama
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Casas
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
El Mante
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Gomez Farias
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Gonzalez
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Gustavo Diaz Ordaz
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Llera
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Reynosa
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 68
Hidalgo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 67
Matamoros
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 67
Rio Bravo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 67
Altamira
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Tula
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Valle Hermoso
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 66
Jaumave
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 65
Jimenez
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 65
San Carlos
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 65
San Fernando
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 65
Bustamante
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 64
Camargo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 64
Miguel Aleman
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 64
Guerrero
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Nuevo Laredo
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 63
Abasolo
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 62
Miquihuana
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Cruillas
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 61
Mendez
pushes back: Land tenure security
Moderately suitable 61
Soto La Marina
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 61
Burgos
pushes back: Land tenure security
Marginally suitable 60
Mier
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
San Nicolas
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Isla
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Marginally suitable 57
Tampico
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Ciudad Madero
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 33
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Mexico
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.