Community suitability of Haryana, India
Marginally suitable confidence B · live score 58
75
best land · p90
88%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 53
Governance, safety & tenure 54
Society, freedom & health 75
Land & water 82
Climate, growing & hazards 56
Autonomy & access 58
Where it pushes back
Food & forage diversityGrowing conditionsGovernance & corruption
Within Haryana — 19 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Panchkula
strongest Land & water (86) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Moderately suitable 62
Mahendragarh
strongest Land & water (81) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Bhiwani
strongest Land & water (79) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 60
Kurukshetra
strongest Land & water (91) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (53)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 59
Kaithal
strongest Land & water (82) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (53)
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 59
Hisar
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 59
Karnal
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Rewari
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Yamuna Nagar
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Ambala
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Rohtak
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Sirsa
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 58
Fatehabad
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 57
Jhajjar
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 57
Gurgaon
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 57
Jind
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 57
Sonepat
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 55
Faridabad
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 54
Panipat
pushes back: Food & forage diversity
Marginally suitable 53
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in India
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.