Community suitability of Aomori, Japan

Highly suitable confidence B · live score 83
89
best land · p90
96%
good land
one block
Explore Aomori on the map →

How each domain holds up

Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 76
Climate, growing & hazards 94
Autonomy & access 86

Where it pushes back

Soil qualityLand cover & degradationLegal entity & land framework

Within Aomori — 66 sub-regions

Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.

Azigasawamati
strongest Economy & cost (96) · weakest Land & water (73)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 86
Nisimeyamura
strongest Autonomy & access (99) · weakest Land & water (70)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 86
Hukauramati
strongest Economy & cost (96) · weakest Land & water (71)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 85
Imabetumati
strongest Economy & cost (96) · weakest Land & water (74)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 85
Kodomarimura
strongest Autonomy & access (98) · weakest Land & water (74)
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 85
Minmayamura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 85
Nakasatomati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 85
Takkomati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 85
Wakinosawamura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 85
Iwasakimura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Kanitamati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Kawautimati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Oohatamati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Saimura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Sitinohemati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Siuramura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 84
Syarikimura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 84
Yomogitamura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 84
Kanagimati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Kazamauramura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 83
Mutusi
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Sannohemati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Singoomura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Tairadatemura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Towadakomati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Yokohamamati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Higasidoorimura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Hirakamati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Ikarigasekimura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Kidukurimati
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 82
Oomamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 82
Tenmabayasimura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Toohokumati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Towadasi
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Inagakimura
pushes back: Coastal risk
Highly suitable 81
Iwakimati
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 81
Oowanimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 81
Soomamura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 81
Hiranaimati
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 80
Nohezimati
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 80
Rokkasyomura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 80
Kamikitamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 79
Kuroisisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Moritamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Gosyogawarasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Kasiwamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Kuraisimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Nanbumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Misawasi
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 76
Nagawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Rokunohemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Turutamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Namiokamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Aomorisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Hirosakisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Gonohemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Hasikamityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Nangoomura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Simodamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Tokiwamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Hukutimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Momoisimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Inakadatemura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Huzisakimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Onoemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Hatinohesi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57

Reading the land, criterion by criterion

Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.

Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening

These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.

Other regions in Japan

Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.