Community suitability of Hukusima, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 81
91
best land · p90
98%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 75
Climate, growing & hazards 95
Autonomy & access 78
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityLand cover & degradationSoil quality
Within Hukusima — 89 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Atusiokanoomura
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (70)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Yamatomati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (72)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Hanawamati
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (75)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Inamura
strongest Autonomy & access (97) ·
weakest Land & water (64)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Katuraomura
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (97) ·
weakest Land & water (74)
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Kitasiobaramura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Miyakozimura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 83
Namiemati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 83
Nangoomura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Tanaguramati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 83
Tateiwamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Haramatisi
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 82
Hurudonomatikyuu
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Kaneyamamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Kawautimura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Nisiaidumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Odakamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 82
Ookumamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 82
Samegawamura
pushes back: Soil quality
Highly suitable 82
Tazimamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Yamaturimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Hutabamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 81
Iitatemura
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 81
Kasimamati
pushes back: Legal entity & land framework
Moderately suitable 81
Nisigoomura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Omotegoomura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 81
Takinemati
pushes back: Soil quality
Moderately suitable 81
Ten'eemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Kitakatasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Misimamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Narahamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 80
Simogoomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Syoowamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Taisinmura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Tokiwamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Asakawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Higasimura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 79
Inawasiromati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 79
Iwasiromati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Sirakawasi
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 79
Soomasi
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 79
Tadamimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Takasatomura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Tomiokamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 79
Toowamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Yanaidumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Hiratamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Hunehikimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Isikawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Onomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Oogoemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Hinoematamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Hukusimasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Naganumamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Ootamamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Sintimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Aidutakadamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Hironomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Iwasemura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Izumizakimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Kawamatamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Bandaimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Nakazimamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Nihonmatusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Adatimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Iwakisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Ryoozenmati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Siokawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Sirasawamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Tamakawamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Tukidatemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Yanagawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Aiduwakamatusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Yabukimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Aidubangemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Kooriyamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Niiturumura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Kunimimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Miharumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Aiduhongoomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Koorimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Sukagawasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Kagamiisimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Yugawamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Motomiyamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Hobaramati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Kawahigasimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Kitaaidumura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Datemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 56
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.