Community suitability of Okayama, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 80
89
best land · p90
97%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 76
Climate, growing & hazards 96
Autonomy & access 69
Where it pushes back
Land cover & degradationWater availability & qualityAccessibility
Within Okayama — 77 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Kagaminotyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (72)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 86
Katutatyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (99) ·
weakest Land & water (73)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Kumetyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (76)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Kusetyoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (73)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Okututyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (66)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Ooharatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Otiaityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Tomison
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Yanaharatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Asahityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Higasiawakurason
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Hokubootyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Kamotyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Katuyamatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Mimasakatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Nagityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Nisiawakurason
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Sakutootyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Syoobokutyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Syooootyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Tuyamasi
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 84
Tyuuootyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Aidatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Kamisaibarason
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Niimisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Singootyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Ukantyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Abason
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Kamogawatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 82
Kumenantyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Highly suitable 82
Oosatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Tesseetyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Tettatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Tyuukason
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Mikamoson
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Takahasisi
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 81
Yatukason
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Yubaratyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Bittyuutyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Kayootyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Nariwatyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 80
Yosinagatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Sinzyooson
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Takebetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Akasakatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Kawakamison
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Saekityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Yosiityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Kawakamityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Biseetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Mitutyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Waketyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Kumayamatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Soozyasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Yakagetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Bizensi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Hinasetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Okutyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Sanyootyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Kasaokasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Mabityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Setotyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Usimadotyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Ibarasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Tamanosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Okayamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Kiyoneson
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Yorisimatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Osahunetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Satosyootyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Yamateson
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Kamogatatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Nadasakityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Hunaotyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Konkootyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Kurasikisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Hayasimatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 41
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.