Community suitability of Ehime, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 80
85
best land · p90
94%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 67
Climate, growing & hazards 96
Autonomy & access 76
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityLand cover & degradationLegal entity & land framework
Within Ehime — 71 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Hiromityoo
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Land & water (64)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Matunotyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (97) ·
weakest Land & water (63)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Mimatyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (97) ·
weakest Land & water (67)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 85
Hiyosimura
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (58)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Misyootyoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (64)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Sirokawatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Yosidatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Hizikawatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Ibbonmatutyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Nomuratyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Uwatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Uwazimasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Kawabemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Tusimatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Zyoohentyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Akehamatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Ikazakityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Odatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Oozusi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Utiumimura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 81
Yanadanimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Mikametyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 80
Mikawamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Nagahamatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Yawatahamasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Honaityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Joohentyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 78
Kumatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Misakityoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 78
Nakazimatyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 78
Nisiumityoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 78
Omogomura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Utikotyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Ikatatyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 77
Setotyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 77
Ikinamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Komatutyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Oomisimatyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 76
Bessiyamamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Hirotamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Tanbaratyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Kamiuratyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Nakayamatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Sigenobutyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Yugetyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 74
Hakatatyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 73
Hutamityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Iwagimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Miyakubotyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Hoozyoosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Kikumatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Saizyoosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 72
Tooyosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Tamagawatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Iyomisimasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Kawautityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Singuumura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Asakuramura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Doityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Oonisityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Tobetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Yosiumityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Namikatatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Matuyamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Kawanoesi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Iyosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 61
Niihamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Imabarisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
Masakityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 40
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.