Community suitability of Gunma, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 79
90
best land · p90
99%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 75
Climate, growing & hazards 93
Autonomy & access 78
Where it pushes back
Land cover & degradationWater availability & qualityLegal entity & land framework
Within Gunma — 68 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Kunimura
strongest Autonomy & access (98) ·
weakest Land & water (71)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 84
Nakanozyoomati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (75)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Nanmokumura
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (76)
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 83
Simonitamati
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (69)
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 83
Nakazatomura
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (76)
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 82
Niiharumura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Tonemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Uenomura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 82
Agatumamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 81
Katasinamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Manbamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 81
Naganoharamati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 81
Kawabamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Takayamamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Tukiyonomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Kusatumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Minakamimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Numatasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Sirasawamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Tumagoimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Azumamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Kurabutimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Matuidamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Syoowamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Kanramati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Kurohonemura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Onisimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Onogamimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Myoogimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Ikahomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Tomiokasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Akagimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Huziokasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Kiryuusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Komotimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Harunamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Oomamamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Huzimimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Miyagimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Yosiimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Annakasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Sibukawasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Misatomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Sintoomura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Kasukawamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Kitatatibanamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Niisatomura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Itakuramati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Tiyodamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Meewamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Yosiokamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Oogomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Ooramati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Ozimamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Tatebayasisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Akaborimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Nittamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Ootasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Sakaimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Sinmati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Yabudukahonmati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Gunmamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 41
Kasakakemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 41
Ooizumimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 41
Takasakisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 41
Tamamuramati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 41
Isesakisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 40
Maebasisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 40
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.