Community suitability of Ibaraki, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 73
92
best land · p90
93%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 82
Climate, growing & hazards 93
Autonomy & access 42
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityLand cover & degradationLegal entity & land framework
Within Ibaraki — 84 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Daigomati
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (99) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (76)
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 82
Miwamura
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (100) ·
weakest Legal & sovereignty (76)
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Highly suitable 81
Yamagatamati
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (99) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (69)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 81
Makabemati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (64)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Ogawamura
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (99) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (67)
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 80
Suihumura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 79
Gozenyamamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Nanakaimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Satomimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Yamatomura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 78
Hokotamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Iwasemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Kitauramura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Yasatomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Akenomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Kanasagoomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Kitaibarakisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Ogawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Taiyoomura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Takahagisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Tamatukurimati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 76
Tiyokawamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Isigemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Kyoowamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Oomiyamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Sakuragawamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Sasimamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Simotumasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Asahimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Iwamamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Katuramura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Asoomati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 73
Kasamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Minorimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Yatiyomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Azumamura
pushes back: Coastal risk
Moderately suitable 72
Edosakimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Hitatiootasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Kawatimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Mihomura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 72
Sekizyoomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Sintonemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Tamarimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Zyoohokumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Dejimamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Simodatesi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Tukubasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Zyuuoomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Isiokasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Iwaisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Mitukaidoosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Tomobemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Uriduramati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Ibarakimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Sakaimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Sanwamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Usiborimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Niiharimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Ryuugasakisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Inamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Ooaraimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Tiyodamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Hitatisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Tonemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Itakomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Kukizakimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Nakamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Yuukisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Utiharamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Amimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 61
Tookaimura
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Usikusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 61
Gokamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Hasakimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Yawaramura
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Huzisiromati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Moriyamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Soowamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Toridesi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Tutiurasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Mitosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 53
Hitatinakasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 52
Kamisumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 49
Kogasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.