Community suitability of Isikawa, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 77
75
best land · p90
89%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 51
Climate, growing & hazards 95
Autonomy & access 84
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityLand cover & degradationSoil quality
Within Isikawa — 41 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Wazimasi
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (54)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Yanagidamura
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (99) ·
weakest Land & water (56)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Anamizumati
strongest Autonomy & access (100) ·
weakest Land & water (53)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Monzenmati
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (99) ·
weakest Land & water (51)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Suzusi
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (56)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Utiuramati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Notomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Togimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Yosinodanimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Kawatimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Nakazimamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Siraminemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Notozimamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Okutimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Rokuseemati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Sikamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Taturuhamamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Toriyamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Kasimamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Yamanakamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Nanaosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 73
Siomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 73
Hakuisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 72
Kanazawasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Osimizumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Torigoemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Komatusi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Takamatumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Kagasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 67
Tatunokutimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Tubatamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Turugimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 64
Unokemati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 64
Kawakitamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 56
Matutoosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 50
Utinadamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 50
Teraimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 49
Neagarimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Nonoitimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.