Community suitability of Miyazaki, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 72
66
best land · p90
21%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 34
Climate, growing & hazards 95
Autonomy & access 75
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityLand cover & degradationSoil quality
Within Miyazaki — 44 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Takatihotyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (35)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Hinokagetyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (32)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Kitagawatyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (97) ·
weakest Land & water (47)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Kitauratyoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (54)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Kitakatatyoo
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (98) ·
weakest Land & water (33)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Kusimasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 73
Ayatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 72
Ebinosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Kitagooson
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Kunitomityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Kobayasisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 70
Kadogawatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Nozirityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Saitosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Takaharutyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Tunotyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Hyuugasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Nobeokasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Toogootyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Takaokatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 67
Takazakityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 66
Takazyootyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Yamadatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 65
Miyakonozyoosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 62
Takanabetyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 61
Kiyotaketyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 60
Miyazakisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 59
Sintomityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 59
Sadowaratyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Marginally suitable 53
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.