Community suitability of Ooita, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 77
84
best land · p90
88%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 63
Climate, growing & hazards 96
Autonomy & access 69
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityLand cover & degradationAccessibility
Within Ooita — 58 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Kiyokawamura
strongest Climate, growing & hazards (97) ·
weakest Land & water (64)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 83
Kakadityoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (73)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Kunimityoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (72)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Kunisakimati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (72)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Matamamati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (73)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Miemati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 82
Honzyoomura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Naokawason
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Ogatamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Highly suitable 81
Saikisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 81
Amagasemati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Hitasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Honyabakeemati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Musasimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Ooyamamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Taketasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Turumimati
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 80
Umemati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Yabakeemati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Yayoimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Yonoodumura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Bungotakadasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Kusumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Ogimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Yamakunimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Akimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Himesimamura
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 78
Innaimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Kamaetyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Kamiuramati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Maetuemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Oonomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Sankoomura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Usasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Notumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Titosemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Asazimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Kamituemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Nakatuemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Naoirimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Ootamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Tukumisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Azimumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Inukaimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Kuzyuumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Kokonoemati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Syoonaityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Yamagamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Nakatusi
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 72
Usukisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Kitukisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Yuhuintyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Notuharumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Hasamamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Saganosekimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Hizimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Beppusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Ooitasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.