Community suitability of Saga, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 71
83
best land · p90
92%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 67
Climate, growing & hazards 93
Autonomy & access 44
Where it pushes back
Water availability & qualityAccessibilityLand cover & degradation
Within Saga — 49 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Genkaityoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (69)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Hizentyoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (68)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Kitahatamura
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (64)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Karatusi
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Autonomy & access (67)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Tinzeetyoo
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (69)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Ootityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Taratyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 75
Imarisi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Nanayamamura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Siotatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Takeosi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 74
Yobukotyoo
pushes back: Land cover & degradation
Moderately suitable 74
Hamatamatyoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 73
Kyuuragimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 73
Yamautityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 73
Kasimasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 72
Kitagatamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Takusi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 72
Ariaketyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Aritamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Sehurimura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Uresinomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 71
Higasisehurison
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 70
Huzityoo
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 70
Mitusemura
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 69
Nisiaritatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Oomatityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Siroisityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Kanzakimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Koohokumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Nakabarutyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Ogimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 68
Hukudomimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Kamiminetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Yamatotyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 66
Kawasoemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Mitagawatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Asikarityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Minetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Higasiyokatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Mikatukityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Usidutyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Kitasigeyasutyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Tiyodatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Kiyamatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Kubotatyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 60
Tosusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 59
Morodomityoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Sagasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 57
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.