Community suitability of Tiba, Japan
Moderately suitable confidence B · live score 70
89
best land · p90
93%
good land
—
one block
How each domain holds up
Legal & sovereignty 76
Governance, safety & tenure 83
Economy & cost 96
Society, freedom & health 96
Land & water 77
Climate, growing & hazards 93
Autonomy & access 39
Where it pushes back
AccessibilityLand cover & degradationWater availability & quality
Within Tiba — 82 sub-regions
Estimated finer-grained reads from the same open data. Phase-1, not yet verified.
Miyosimura
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (71)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Tikuramati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (66)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 80
Kamogawasi
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (69)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Maruyamamati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (71)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Sirahamamati
strongest Economy & cost (96) ·
weakest Land & water (65)
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Tateyamasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 79
Tomiyamamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 78
Amatukominatomati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Nosakamati
pushes back: Coastal risk
Moderately suitable 77
Ootakimati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Toyooramati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 77
Yookaitibasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 77
Katuurasi
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Kyonanmati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Onzyukumati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 76
Takomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 76
Hikarimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Koozakimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Kurimotomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Simohusamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Taieemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Yokosibamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 75
Asahisi
pushes back: Coastal risk
Moderately suitable 74
Hasunumamura
pushes back: Coastal risk
Moderately suitable 74
Hikatamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Isumimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Matuomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Yamadamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 74
Ooharamati
pushes back: Water availability & quality
Moderately suitable 73
Sibayamamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 73
Kimitusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Narutoomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Sanbumati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 72
Iiokamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Sawarasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Unakamimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 71
Naritasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 70
Huttusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Kuzyuukurimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Misakimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Mutuzawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Nagaramati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Sakaemati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 69
Itiharasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Sirakomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Tyoonanmati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Tyoosisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Yatimatasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 68
Omigawamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Ooamisirasatomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Toonosyoomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 67
Tomisatomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 65
Itinomiyamati
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 64
Inbamura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 63
Tyooseemura
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 62
Kisaradusi
pushes back: Accessibility
Moderately suitable 61
Sodegaurasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 61
Mobarasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Tibasi_Midoriku
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Tibasi_Wakabaku
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 58
Inzeetyoo
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Nodasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Sisuimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Syoonanmati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 55
Sakurasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Sekiyadomati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 54
Siroimati
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 43
Abikosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Kamagayasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 42
Hunabasisi
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 41
Kasiwasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 41
Nagareyamasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 41
Yatiyosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 41
Yotukaidoosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Marginally suitable 41
Matudosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 40
Tibasi_Hanamigawaku
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 40
Itikawasi
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 39
Tibasi_Inageku
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 39
Tibasi_Tyuuooku
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 39
Narasinosi
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 38
Tibasi_Mihamaku
pushes back: Accessibility
Currently not suitable 37
excluded excl
Reading the land, criterion by criterion
Each signal names the open dataset behind it and how measured it is.
Legal entity & land frameworkcountry B OECD FDI RRI + manual
Education & schooling freedomcountry B HSLDA + UNESCO UIS
Seed & agricultural autonomycountry C UPOV membership proxy
Governance & corruptioncountry A World Bank WGI + Transparency CPI
Land tenure securitycountry A IPRI (de jure) + Prindex (de facto)
Business & economic viabilitycountry A World Bank B-READY, Heritage, Fraser
Cost of living, labour & landcountry A World Bank PPP, ILOSTAT
Monetary & capital sovereigntycountry A IMF/World Bank, Chinn-Ito
Personal freedomcountry A Cato/Fraser Human Freedom Index
Healthcare qualitycountry B WHO GHO
Disease / vector burden A Malaria Atlas + dengue Index P
Soil quality A SoilGrids (ISRIC)
Water availability & quality A WRI Aqueduct + AQUASTAT
Terrain & buildability A SRTM / NASADEM
Land cover & degradation A ESA WorldCover + Global Forest Watch
Biodiversity & alignment B Biodiversity Intactness Index
Climate & natural hazards A ThinkHazard + NASA FIRMS + USGS
Growing conditions A CHELSA / FAO GAEZ
Food & forage diversity B FAO GAEZ crop suitability + GLW
Coastal risk B Climate Central CoastalDEM
Energy potential A Global Solar Atlas + Global Wind Atlas
Natural building materials B SoilGrids clay + forest + geology
Environmental quality A SEDAC PM2.5 + VIIRS night-lights
Connectivity A Ookla + ITU (+ Starlink)
Accessibility A Malaria Atlas friction surface
Remoteness / surroundings A GPWv4 population density
Contamination legacy C Maus mining polygons + WRI power plants
Phase-1 desk screening
These are desk numbers from open data. Soil tests, water rights and the welcome of actual neighbours all wait for a visit — we'd rather say so than pretend.
Other regions in Japan
Compare nearby options, ranked by overall suitability.